No competition, even though I have never had Ruination it has to be better than Bud.
I also do NOT consider Bud a lager, as lagers should be stored for several weeks before sale, not rushed out of the factory before they have had a chance develop flavour.
Depends on your point of view.
If you’re drinking specifically to get blitzed, the the Bud would be a better choice. You can drink lots of those without any trouble.
However, if you;re drinking for the taste, then IMO the Ruination (one of my top 2 or 3 favorite beers ever) would be the way to go.
The Ruination is a very big, very hoppy beer. It’s higher in alcohol than the Bud, but it;s tough to drink more than a couple 12-oz or a bomber (22-oz) at a sitting.
3 Responses to What is a better beer Budweiser Lager or Stone Ruination IPA?
Weatherman
December 16th, 2010 at 1:21 am
No competition, even though I have never had Ruination it has to be better than Bud.
I also do NOT consider Bud a lager, as lagers should be stored for several weeks before sale, not rushed out of the factory before they have had a chance develop flavour.
J. R
December 16th, 2010 at 2:00 am
Depends on your point of view.
If you’re drinking specifically to get blitzed, the the Bud would be a better choice. You can drink lots of those without any trouble.
However, if you;re drinking for the taste, then IMO the Ruination (one of my top 2 or 3 favorite beers ever) would be the way to go.
The Ruination is a very big, very hoppy beer. It’s higher in alcohol than the Bud, but it;s tough to drink more than a couple 12-oz or a bomber (22-oz) at a sitting.
BEER
December 16th, 2010 at 2:18 am
Not a great beer but in most cases/times a better choice is Stone Ruination IPA.
Technically Budweiser is lager for a few weeks but only a real beer man knows this.